|
The following is the sixth in a series
of questions being presented about the upcoming DeLeon ISD bond issue
that will be on the May 12 ballot. The response for the question is
provided by Dr. Randy Mohundro, Superintendent of Schools for DISD.
Question -- “Why can't this school
construction project be put off for a few years down the road when our
local economy has had time to get better?”
The first reason that waiting is not in
the best interest of the district is cost of the project. Each year
that the district waits to do this project will likely cost the
district approximately $1 million in additional cost that will have to
be added to accomplish what is now being proposed. That means that
instead of doing work on every campus for all of the students of the
district, waiting will mean that some students will not get the same
benefits as others.
The reason that we know that cost are
going up is to look back at the history of school construction over
the last ten years. In 1997 a building constructed similar to what is
being proposed now was costing approximately $62 a square foot. This
cost included all fees that are associated with school construction.
In 2003, that same building was costing $90 a square foot to build. In
budgeting the current project the district has used $125 a square
foot. In ten years the cost to build a school building has doubled.
The reason for this cost increase is due
to several reasons. First, of course, is inflation. Just as it has hit
everything that must be done in the course of business, inflation has
also hit the area of school construction.
Another reason that school construction costs have increased is due to
the increase in the number of building codes that have now come into
existence that must be followed. New requirements have come in about
the area of air quality, energy conservation, and building standards
that have pushed construction costs up. On the horizon are more new
building codes that will require buildings to become even more energy
efficient and meet new standards for “green” buildings. All of these
requirements will push the cost of building schools even higher, and
may increase subsequent operating costs as well.
The other cause for the rising costs that
has to be acknowledged is the increased demand for building materials.
The world economy is moving at a rate that is causing the building
materials market to see pressure that has caused prices to rise
sharply. While some people will blame the hurricanes of 2005 others
say that the building boom that is being seen in the far east in India
and China is the factor, the result has been a constant rising of
prices for the materials used to build schools.
Unfortunately, once the cost of
construction goes up, it does not go down.
The State of Texas has also recently
given school districts a unique opportunity. For the first time in the
history of public education in Texas, school districts have the
opportunity to actually lower their total tax rate and, at the same
time, issue debt for the purpose of constructing schools. The
compression of the local tax rate allows a tax payer to see their
total school tax rate decreased, compared to the rate that was adopted
by the school board in the previous year.
Why does this matter? The importance of
this is that a local property owner will not see an increase in their
school tax bill for the coming school year when compared to the rate
that was charged this previous year. Typically, when a school district
passes a bond issue, the local taxpayer will see an increase in their
school property tax bill. This time, however the taxpayer will not
experience an increase in additional out of pocket expense for the
students of the district to have improved school facilities. What a
taxpayer is paying is what they will have to pay, and with the tax
rate actually being decreased by $0.0325, they should see a lower tax
bill.
The other reason that now is the time is
due to the state funding that will be available. The State of Texas
and its Existing Debt Allotment means that the state will pay 43% of
the district’s annual bond payment. The only way that the district can
access these funds is to issue debt.
If the district does not have debt that
can be enrolled with this program, those state monies will be to
another district.
The amount of money that is being made
available is significant. Rather the district having an annual bond
payment of $615,000, the district would only be paying $382,000. The
state would be contributing $238,000 each year for the life of the
bond.
Why would DeLeon leave this kind of money
on the table?
Another way to think about it is that
rather than having to pay $125 per square foot, the district would
only have to pay $66.25 per square foot.
No additional out-of-pocket for the local
taxpayer, and the State of Texas being a major player in paying for
school facilities in DeLeon, makes this the time to seize the
opportunity before the cost of construction makes these projects no
longer a realistic posibility for the students of DeLeon ISD. |