|
The DeLeon ISD Board of Trustees met on
August 7 for what will be the first of two meetings for the month. The
Board’s focus for this meeting was a review and discussion of the
2006-2007 budget.
Following approval of the consent agenda
for the month of August, the Board was then given a presentation by
Dr. Randy Mohundro, Superintendent, of various aspects of the budget.
Dr. Mohundro began by presenting district goal areas for the coming
school year. He explained that the budget priorities and decisions
should be focused on the needs and the direction that the district was
now heading. Goals areas for the coming year include:
• Raising the district accreditation
rating to Exemplary
• Increased parent and community
involvement
• Increased attendance for areas of the
district and decreasing student drop outs
• Improvement in the areas of reading and
writing
• College readiness and increased college
opportunities for student
• High quality staff development
• Quality service to special population
areas.
Dr. Mohundro then provided an overview of
revenue flow for the district for the coming school year. Beginning
with the local tax base the 2006 certified values were presented. The
district has seen an increase in its tax base, growing from
$115,944,808 in 2005 to $125,243,791 in 2006. The tax base as
presented did not include those properties whose values have been
frozen, which provides an additional $111, 644 in revenue.
A review of the new school finance
program was then presented. Mohundro explained that for planning
purposes, all numbers used for the coming school year are the numbers
that district ended with for the 2005-2006 school year. Given the
stabilization of student enrollment, no increase or decrease was
forecasted for the coming school year.
An explanation of the new formulas for
determining the local compressed property tax was then detailed. For
2005-06 the maintenance and operation tax rate for the district was
$1.3308 per $100 of value. The compressed rate for the district for
the 2006-07 tax year based on recent passed legislation is $1.1800.
Mohundro then went on to explain that for the district to receive all
available state funding that the actual tax rate needed would be
$1.2200, reduction of $0.11 from the previous year.
The $0.04 difference between the
compressed rate and the recommended tax rate is a result of the
state’s new system that requires the district to maximize its tax
effort at the local level to receive all available state monies.
“While the $0.04 will generate
approximately $50,000 in local revenue, it will generate approximately
$120,000 in additional state money, which is a sizeable amount of
money to leave on the table,” explained Mohundro.
When asked why the district should not
raise the tax by $0.05 instead of the $0.04, it was explained that the
state will only equalize the first $0.04 and that anything above the
$0.04 would force the district to hold a rollback election. The $0.04
is what benefits the district the greatest. Mohundro also explained
that those districts that taxed below the compressed rate would see an
actual decrease in the amount of state money they received due to
having a low tax effort.
Mohundro then covered the new state
funding formulas. Under the formulas the district will receive the
same amount of money per student that it received in 2005-06. It was
also noted that even when the state compresses tax rates again next
year, the district will continue to receive the same per student
amount as it did in 2005-06, with the state providing additional
revenue for the new compressed tax rate, as long as the district
continues to maximize its local taxing effort.
A review of the expenditure portion of
the budget was then presented. The sizeable increase in district’s
expenditures comes in the area of salaries. The district is required
by the state to provide a $2,500 salary increase to all teachers,
librarians, and school counselors, and a $250 increase for all support
personnel over their 2005-2006 salary. The state provides the funding
for these salary increases. In connection with this mandated salary
increase, a new local salary scale was reviewed. The new scale would
provide a salary increase for district employees, and provide a local
supplement for all professional employees.
In other areas of the budget, except for
personnel cost, costs were held constant or decreased. An exception to
this was seen in the budgets for district libraries. Funds were
provided in the new budget to allow for additional library books to be
purchased for the coming school year. “A problem that we have,” noted
elementary principal Judd Gibson, “is that our students have run out
of books to read that they have not already read.” The budget allows
for all collections to increase.
The district will also receive an
additional $49,500 in state monies to be used to help high school
students become better prepared to enter college. The district will
provide tuition assistance for any high school senior interested in
obtaining college credit this coming school year. Twelve hours of
college courses will be offered in the district via distance learning
and onsite instruction during the coming year. The district will also
use the funding to improve the high school library for students to
work on their writing and research skills.
The area of technology would see funds of
approximately $50,000 allocated for their update and support.
Approximately $42,000 of these funds come from federal and dedicated
state funds with only $8,000 in local funds being used for technology.
All federal programs were reviewed with
the administration showing that all federal monies were being
maximized for the district’s greatest benefit.
Following the presentation of both the
revenue and expenditure portion of the budget, the administration
recommended that the Board adopt a proposed tax rate of $1.2492, per
$100 of value, composed of a maintenance and operation tax of $1.22
and an interest and sinking tax rate of $0.0292. The proposed tax rate
is $0.1108 lower than 2055-2006. The Board voted unanimously to
propose the rate as recommended.
The Board will meet on August 28 to
formally adopt the 2006-07 budget and the 2006-07 tax rate at a
special meeting for that purpose.
In other business the administration
updated the Board on the flooring project at the high school. Asbestos
has been identified and the project has been put on hold. Currently
the asbestos is contained and not a hazard, however, to remove it will
incur additional cost. The district is currently having its asbestos
plan updated to insure that any asbestos in the district has been
properly identified. The next opportunity to remove the flooring will
occur during semester break in December.
The Board approved the recommendation of
the administration to employ Kelly Shelton as elementary counselor and
Kara Werner as a speech therapist for the special education
cooperative.
The Board was invited to participate in
opening school activities during staff development beginning next
Monday, August 14. |